Skip to main content
Anatomy of IsolationPart 5 of 5

Anatomy of Isolation: The Documented Sequence

A Two-Year Pattern of Isolation

By Levi Bakke·

The isolation of Russell Bingaman followed a documented pattern, with the guardian logs providing independent verification.

Documentation manipulation: Staff were instructed to "document negative behaviors after Patty's visits, regardless of whether such behaviors were related to the visit" (Callahand declaration), and to "chart behaviors as if Patty caused them" (Nice declaration). Original logs showed 94.4% positive visits. Pages were missing from court submissions. Guardian logs showed visits the facility didn't record, and showed the facility selectively reporting negative behaviors to guardians while omitting positive visits.

Medical exploitation: Hospice enrollment without meeting criteria (Russell's speech was not limited to five words). A prognosis issued to "enable Mr. Bingman to have access to hospice care" even though guardians were "unaware of any diagnosis" warranting a six-month prognosis (December 2024 Baum statement). Chemical restraints increased with legal proceedings. Medications continued despite documented adverse reactions to Ativan and Benadryl.

Authority confusion: The invalid IBL was ruled "not valid" by DHS in October 2023, yet the attorney was still billing for "issue with IBL" in June 2024 though the IBL was invalid and unused. No court order existed in July 2024. The DHS phone call "advice" had no legal basis. The guardians claimed authority beyond legal limits through abuse of ORS 125.323.

Financial motivation: $1,000/day "additional staffing" charges were billed without evidence of additional staff hired. The attorney billed the estate for IBL work though the IBL was invalid and unused. The facility billed for services not provided.

Information control: Patricia was not informed of the hospice enrollment, the telehealth appointment, or the medication changes. She was locked out without notice. The hospice enrollment was deliberately concealed: "Patty is not aware Russell is on hospice again." The guardian logs show the facility controlling information flow to both Patricia and the guardians.

The isolation of Russell Bingaman from his wife didn't happen overnight. Records show a two-year progression.

Phase 1 (February 2022 - December 2022): Initial hospice enrollment despite not meeting criteria. April 2022: social worker documents facility agreeing to allow Patricia visits "as often as she wants." December 2022: mediated meeting where Bartell expresses concern about "increased agitation" with Patricia's visits.

Phase 2 (January 2023 - December 2023): March 2023: Russell discharged from hospice for "STAGNATION OF DECLINES, PATIENT NO LONGER MEETS CRITERIA." August 2023: invalid IBL created. October 2023: police enforcement of invalid IBL. December 2023: guardianship proceedings initiated.

Phase 3 (January 2024 - June 2024): March 2024: family agreement guaranteeing Patricia's visits. March-July 2024: 36 documented visits with 94.4% showing no issues. Documentation manipulation begins. Attorney billing for invalid IBL work.

Phase 4 (June - July 2024): June 27: hospice re-enrollment without proper examination. July 3: physical lockout begins. July 10: DHS phone call advising "lock door to keep Patty out." July 10: hospice notes "PATTY IS NOT AWARE RUSSELL IS ON HOSPICE AGAIN."

On July 10, 2024, when DHS officials advised that Nadine's Nest could "lock door to keep Patty out," they provided the mechanism for what had been building for two years. They didn't invoke the IBL that had been ruled invalid. They didn't cite a court order that didn't exist. They advised a locked door based on guardians' wishes. The same day, hospice notes recorded: "Patty is not aware Russell is on hospice again."

A husband who repeatedly asked to go home would remain locked away from his wife for forty-six days. A wife who had visited her husband nearly daily for 58 years would stand outside a locked door. Since they were 14 and 15 years old, Patricia and Russell had only been separated by his service in Vietnam. Now they were separated by a locked door, justified by documents that didn't exist and authority that was never granted.

The guardian logs—maintained by those seeking to restrict Russell's contact with his wife—provide proof showing discrepancies between what the facility reported to guardians and what appeared in official records.

Later hospice paperwork would attempt to rewrite these facts; we address those alterations in our next chapter.

This report relies on sworn testimony, clinical records, guardian logs maintained by Cheryl Murchison, and agency communications cited above. We will append any formal statements those parties later publish in court or with regulators.

Next: The Numbers Don't Lie


DISCLAIMER

This report is based on sworn testimony, contemporaneous records, guardian logs, agency communications, and other documentary evidence cited herein. All factual assertions are supported by the referenced materials, and all opinions or conclusions are presented as interpretations of the disclosed facts. Where possible, direct quotations are used to ensure accuracy and context.

The events described concern matters of significant public interest, including elder care, guardianship practices, and state regulatory oversight. The information presented is intended for public awareness and accountability.

The authors have made diligent efforts to verify the accuracy of all statements and to protect the privacy of non-central individuals. Names and identifying details of third parties have been anonymized or redacted unless already a matter of public record or essential to understanding the issues.

Any communications labeled "for settlement purposes" or similar are included only after confirming they are not subject to mediation privilege or court-ordered confidentiality.

Audio and video materials referenced in this report have been published in transcript form, with consent from Patricia Bingaman, personal representative of Russell Bingaman. Non-consenting third parties have been anonymized or redacted in accordance with applicable privacy laws.

If any party believes a statement herein is inaccurate or wishes to provide a formal response, please contact Info@valorinvestigations.com. Verified corrections or statements will be appended to the online version of this report.