By Levi Bakke
Published August 15, 2025
In the story that follows, you'll read how Russell Bingaman—a 76-year-old veteran with Alzheimer's—was systematically isolated from his wife of 58 years through falsified documents, illegal medications, and a locked door. You'll see guardian logs that inadvertently prove the deception. You'll hear from whistleblowers who describe being ordered to fabricate negative reports. You'll learn how a phone call between attorneys and DHS officials resulted in advice to "lock door to keep Patty out"—without any legal authority.
But to understand why this could happen, you need to know one critical fact our FOIA investigation revealed: Despite years of documented violations, Nadine's Nest Adult Foster Home has never received a substantive citation from DHS.
Our review of DHS records uncovered a pattern that explains everything:
Result: Zero violations. Zero sanctions. Zero enforcement actions.
Why? Because Nadine's Nest isn't just any adult foster home. Its owner, Tempie Bartell, sits at a critical intersection of the Union County Nexus:
When DHS investigators arrive at Nadine's Nest, they're not investigating a stranger—they're investigating their longtime colleague, their expert witness, their partner in child protection.
This is why Patricia Bingaman's desperate fight to see her husband met dead ends at every turn:
In the Union County Nexus, every door that should lead to help instead leads back to the same network.
What you're about to read isn't just one family's tragedy—it's the documented proof of how a sophisticated rural power structure neutralizes every protection supposedly in place for vulnerable citizens. Theguardian logs, maintained by Russell's own children, inadvertently provide evidence of the coordination. The whistleblower testimony reveals the deliberate nature of the deception. The medication records show the chemical restraints. The billing records expose the financial motivations.
But most damning of all is what our FOIA requests revealed: Everyone knew. DHS knew the isolation was illegal. They knew the records were falsified. They knew the facility was dangerously understaffed. They knew medications were being illegally prescribed.
They just chose to protect the nexus instead of Russell Bingaman.
For 46 days, Patricia Bingaman stood outside a locked door, unable to see her husband of 58 years. Not because of a court order—none existed. Not because of a valid restriction—DHS had ruled it invalid. But because Tempie Bartell's facility operated under different rules than any other foster home in Eastern Oregon. Because when you're part of the nexus, accountability is something that happens to other people.
Russell Bingaman died on January 29, 2025. His death certificate lists "Complications of Alzheimer Dementia" as the cause. The records tell a different story—one of systematic isolation, chemical restraint, and a protection network that chose to shield itself rather than save him.
The following investigation, "Anatomy of Isolation," draws from thousands of pages of records, including DHS investigations, Medicare billing data, sworn testimony, and guardian logs that were never meant to reveal what they ultimately proved: In Union County, the system designed to protect the vulnerable instead protects itself.
In Union County, two clocks were running. In twenty-three days (June 17 → July 10, 2024), a routine "issue with IBL" entry, a drafted motion, and a video-only prognosis culminated in a call where DHS/APD licensing was cited to "lock door to keep Patty out." Separately, the lockout itself lasted forty-six days of no visits after July 3, with physical turn-away documented July 12. The same day as the call, a hospice note recorded: "Patty is not aware Russell is on hospice again." This chapter documents the sequence of events that led to that lockout.
The promise had been clear. On April 3, 2024, a court-approved family agreement guaranteed Patricia Bingaman would "continue to visit Protected Person in the same manner that she has historically visited him." Russell Bingaman, 76, suffering from Alzheimer's disease, had been in Nadine's Nest adult foster home since February 2022. His wife of 58 years had visited him nearly daily.
Records show what followed that April promise: a series of actions resulting in Patricia's exclusion through documentation, medical decisions, and ultimately, physical lockout.
Russell Bingaman entered Nadine's Nest on February 21, 2022, and was enrolled in hospice by February 16, 2022 (before his admission to the facility).
Medicare hospice eligibility for dementia requires specific criteria: a FAST score of 7a or higher (speech limited to five words or less), dependence for 5/6 or 6/6 Activities of Daily Living, and a physician's certification of six months or less to live. The certification triggered enhanced Medicare payments and permitted aggressive pharmaceutical interventions typically reserved for end-of-life care.
Yet Russell's actual condition contradicted this terminal diagnosis. On February 21, 2022, his first day at Nadine's Nest, facility records note: "MR B WAS TRYING TO ESCAPE." Staff quickly walked outside with him; he returned angry. The discussion turned immediately to Haloperidol "if needed to help patient with agitation for the night."
A week later, on February 28, Russell told staff: "GET ME OUT OF HERE."
By March 7, 2022, RN Alice Shaw documented, based on caregiver Alicia's report: "HE HAS DAYS THAT HE STILL TRIES TO 'GO HOME.' HE CAN BE RE-DIRECTED MOST DAYS."
In March 2022, facility owner Tempie Bartell instructed staff not to allow family visits yet because Russell was "still adjusting" and they were "unsure how he would deal with seeing family." This despite Russell repeatedly asking to go home and attempting to leave.
By April 2022, a Heart and Home hospice counselor documented that facility staff were "open to a plan allowing Patty to visit 'as often as she wants'" on days with two staff working. Yet by December 2022, during a mediated meeting, Tempie Bartell expressed concern that Russell had been "more agitated and restless in the last few weeks since Patty has been able to visit freely."
When Patricia's visits finally resumed, the documentation began. But not accurately.
A comprehensive forensic review of facility logs from March through July 2024 examined 36 documented spouse visits. The finding: 94.4% recorded no issues. Typical entries read:
By August 14, 2023, Bartell drafted and formalized her restrictions request. The Individually-Based Limitation (IBL) document claimed:
The children signed the document. Patricia was not consulted.
Notably, this IBL was created just months after Russell had been discharged from hospice in March 2023 for "STAGNATION OF DECLINES, PATIENT NO LONGER MEETS CRITERIA FOR HOSPICE." He was too healthy for hospice but supposedly too fragile for his wife's visits.
Patricia initially complied with the restriction for nearly two weeks. Then someone at DHS told her the truth—the IBL was not valid. When Patricia went to visit Russell after learning this, on October 31, 2023 (Halloween), the police were called to escort her from the property at Tempie Bartell's request.
The La Grande Police officer told Patricia: "...but at the time the owner Tempie doesn't want you here..."
Russell was acutely aware of the situation. When Patricia explained the police were there to escort her out, Russell responded:
Earlier, when Patricia arrived after two weeks of being banned, Russell had said: "I said I should have walked out of the son of a bitch..."
Patricia told the officers she'd been married to Russell for 57 years, together since she was 14 and he was 15. The officer responded: "Well, you did it anyway. That's bravery. Takes an old farm woman to be brave."
DHS investigated. Investigation ID 00294325 reached a definitive conclusion: the IBL was "not valid and had to be removed." The investigation determined "no restrictions on visitation will be initiated." The allegation of involuntary seclusion was marked "Not Substantiated."
In December 2023, while the invalid IBL issue remained unresolved, Russell's two sons—Shawn and Austin Bingaman—were appointed as co-guardians. Patricia initially objected but withdrew her challenge after negotiating protections.
The resulting March 15, 2024, family agreement seemed to resolve the conflict. Paragraph 2.1(b) explicitly guaranteed: "Patricia will continue to visit Protected Person in the same manner that she has historically visited him."
That agreement would last 94 days.
Former facility manager Elisha Callahand, employed from October 6, 2023, to November 12, 2024, provided statements about what she witnessed in early 2024:
In an interview, she stated that "Staff were instructed to document negative behaviors after Patty's visits, regardless of whether such behaviors were related to the visit."
She elaborated that facility records contained "pages missing," which she stated were altered to create a negative impression of Patricia's visits. When she challenged this practice, she was told it was necessary to "justify visitation restrictions."
Caregiver Lisa Nice corroborated this in an interview: "Management instructed staff to 'chart behaviors as if Patty caused them.'" She even testified in court: "I never observed any increased agitation following Patricia's visits. Russell was always delighted to see her."
Elisha Callahand and Lisa Nice didn't work together or know each other, yet both independently described the same documentation manipulation.
The guardians maintained their own contemporaneous logs through Cheryl Murchison. These logs provide crucial evidence of manipulation—Cheryl documented what facility staff told her in real-time, creating an independent record of what the facility was reporting to the guardians versus what appeared in their official logs.
The comparison reveals significant discrepancies:
Visits Documented in Guardian Logs but Missing from Facility Records:
Why would the facility tell Cheryl about these visits but not record them in their official logs? The pattern suggests selective documentation—reporting certain incidents to the guardians while omitting others from the official record.
The guardian logs also reveal the facility's real-time reporting patterns. On April 11, Cheryl documented: "Ray recorded - Patty telling Russell Kids took her to court and his girlfriend. She lost. *then Dad refused care"
The note about recording raises a question: was recording Patricia and Russell without their knowledge legal? Regardless, the facility's official logs for this period show no such incident.
A comprehensive review of facility logs from March through July 2024 reveals 36 documented visits by Patricia. Out of these 36 visits, only 2 (5.6%) had direct issues documented. The remaining 94.4% showed no issues.
Critically, not a single instance shows Russell's problematic behaviors were caused solely by Patricia's presence. When behavioral issues occurred around her visits, there were always other documented factors:
The nurses' own documentation contradicts the isolation narrative. In September 2024, RN Cristie Campbell wrote that caregivers reported Russell became "HOSTILE AND PHYSICALLY AGGRESSIVE" following Patricia's visits. Yet the actual facility logs from the preceding months showed 94.4% of visits had no issues—a fact the nurses either didn't know or chose to ignore.
Audio recordings from Patricia's visits in spring 2024 capture Russell's actual state:
April 22, 2024:
April 23, 2024:
May 24, 2024:
June 19, 2024:
These weren't the words of a man limited to five-word sentences, as his hospice diagnosis required. These were the words of a man who knew exactly where he was and wanted to leave.
While Bartell claimed Patricia's visits required "additional staffing," statements from staff revealed a different truth.
Elisha Callahand described the actual staffing situation from May 2024 onward:
Callahand noted that she and likely other employees were hired as "contractors" despite having set schedules and all the requirements of employees. This arrangement stuck the employees with all the taxes while Tempie Bartell avoided paying employment taxes.
The staffing situation was so dire that when caregiver Ray needed time off, Tempie Bartell prescribed her anti-depressants instead of addressing the staffing crisis.
In an interview, Callahand described her frustration with Bartell's indifference: "We have staffing issues and you don't give a shit." When Callahand had asked for help, Bartell's response was to say she would cancel her appointments at her clinic and come in herself—if that's what Elisha wanted—making Elisha feel guilty for even asking.
The facility would later bill for "additional staffing/visitation non-compliance" at $1,000 per month.. But there was no additional staff. There was barely adequate staff for basic operations.
Between February 2022 and July 2024, facility records document Russell's repeated attempts to leave:
A caregiver confirmed in June 2024: "yes, he made many attempts to leave the premises."
Elisha Callahand observed that Russell's "agitation" wasn't specific to Patricia's visits: "It's not like he only did it when she came. It depended on who visited that day and how many visitors he had."
Attorney billing records from Baum Smith show that on June 17, 2024, Wyatt Baum, representing the two co-guardians, reviewed an "issue with IBL" during a telephone call with Shawn. The IBL had been ruled invalid by DHS eight months earlier. Yet Baum would bill the estate for this IBL-related work, even though the July lockout would ultimately proceed without invoking any IBL.
Two days later, Baum drafted a "motion to limit association." Attorney staff conferred with Baum, reviewed the motion, and began drafting supporting declarations and orders.
Cheryl's guardian log for this date notes: "Ray called Shawn @11:03AM Patty there @NN cutting Dads hair." The facility was reporting Patricia's presence to the guardians while legal documents were being prepared to exclude her.
The day after the motion was drafted, Tempie Bartell prescribed Chlorpromazine 50mg for Russell from Red Cross Institutional Pharmacy, with her name listed as the prescriber.
This act directly contradicted her sworn testimony on September 10, 2024, when she stated: "I don't provide direct patient care. I don't... I'm not like the medical provider for any of the residents."
Tempie Bartell sent an email to Shawn Bingaman and Wyatt Baum declaring that Russell "has to be moved out of Nadine's Nest ASAP." Her stated reasons:
Attorney staff finalized and filed the Motion to Limit Association documents the same day.
The guardian logs for this date reveal what the facility was actually reporting: "he kept walking outside and talking about calling the school. He refused dinner and kept walking outside at 5:30 PM I called for another shift worker to come in and help as he had me walking along the street trying to cross for over 30 minutes." No mention of Patricia causing this behavior—Russell was exit-seeking on his own.
Russell had a telehealth consultation with Cami A. Bean, FNP-C, from La Grande Family Medicine/Praxis Health. Crucially:
Bean's determination: "Given chronic conditions, history, and current status I suspect he has 6 months or less left in his life."
The guardian logs note: "Dad's Heart + Oxy low after Patty's visit?? Anxiety??" with question marks—even the guardians weren't certain of causation.
The facility was instructed to monitor Russell's vital signs daily while waiting for hospice admission.
What Bean didn't document: Russell's actual weight, his ability to walk and communicate, or any direct observation of his condition.
Months later, in a December 20, 2024 settlement proposal, Attorney Wyatt Baum would write: "As to the notation in the medical records of Mr. Bingaman having six months to live, I understand health care providers did that to enable Mr. Bingman to have access to hospice care. My clients are unaware of any diagnosis or concern regarding Mr. Bingaman's health that puts his life expectancy to six months."
Former facility manager Elisha Callahand understood this prognosis was "not an actual (real prognosis)" because she understood it to be normal to do that just to give patients access to hospice care. Even the guardians viewed hospice as beneficial "advanced care" and were stressed when Russell "didn't qualify" anymore in March 2023. This reveals a backwards understanding—coming off hospice meant Russell was improving, but they were told otherwise.
Russell was admitted to hospice. His primary terminal diagnosis: "Alzheimer's Disease with Late Onset."
The same day, Attorney Wyatt Baum reviewed an "email on IBL issues."
Patricia arrived for her regular visit. The door was locked.
Austin Bingaman later stated that he and his brother "decided to cut off visits starting that day until the court made a decision" because previous attempts to limit visits had failed and Patricia was "unreasoning."
Their attorney had abused ORS 125.323, a law put in place in 2019 specifically to prevent guardians from isolating protected persons. Nancy Nathanson, who championed the law, has been informed about how it was abused in this case.
No court order existed prohibiting Patricia's visits. The March family agreement guaranteeing her access remained in effect.
The guardian logs document: "S-A met w/ Aaron @DHS on IBL" and "Shawn checked on Dad -Dad restless but finally sat down."
Russell's chart noted medication interactions for Donepezil with Haloperidol Lactate and Ondansetron. The physician notation: "MD AWARE, BENEFITS OUTWEIGH RISKS."
The guardian logs show: "Patty showed up @ NN w/Jody Bullock"—Patricia attempted to visit but was denied entry while the guardians' friend Jody Bullock was apparently allowed access.
A hospice pre-death bereavement risk assessment phone visit note explicitly stated: "PATTY IS UNAWARE RUSSELL IS ON HOSPICE AGAIN."
The note continued: "Shawn (Russell's son and power of attorney) wanted support provided to his mom."
Patricia was deliberately kept uninformed about her husband's hospice enrollment. She would only learn of it through court discovery.
The guardian logs confirm: "Cheri from Hospice called for permission to work w/ Patty -S-A said Yes"—but without telling Patricia that Russell was on hospice.
Whistleblowers later indicated that staff were instructed to conceal hospice enrollment from Patricia.
The guardian logs memorialize the pivotal phone call. Participants:
The log entry: "Aaron – Nadines Nest can lock door to keep Patty out Erin Smith talked w/ Aaron + Tempie"
That same day, a hospice bereavement note recorded: "Patty is not aware Russell is on hospice again."
Selina Shaffer, a nurse with over three decades of experience who would later testify as an expert witness at the guardianship case, accompanied Patricia to visit Russell. They were physically blocked from entering Nadine's Nest.
Elisha Callahand met them at the door. She did not let them inside, though they took clothes for Russell.
The guardian logs document this: "Patty went to NN w/ Selina Elisha met them @door and did not let them inside - took clothes for Dad -Shawn talked to Elisha - Dad doing great."
Shaffer found the incident so alarming she filed an abuse report with DHS, noting "there was no court order explicitly forbidding visits at that time."
An RN note in Russell's chart stated: "agitation well controlled with lorazepam, wife not allowed in facility, pt less agitated since not dealing with wife."
The guardian logs for this day note: "Elisha said Dad is much better overall - not anxious and agitated -grumpiness normal for dementia"—attributing his improved state to Patricia's absence while acknowledging his baseline grumpiness was just "normal for dementia."
As legal proceedings approached, the documentary record itself became contested.
Elisha Callahand stated "there are definitely pages missing" from the logs. She confirmed that Bartell came in and took the logs home one night. Additionally, there was one entry with handwriting noticeably different from all the rest, which Elisha immediately questioned: "Who wrote this?!"
The guardian logs maintained by Cheryl Murchison provide proof of manipulation. When the guardians' own records show visits that don't appear in facility logs, it reveals discrepancies in documentation. When Cheryl documents what staff told her about Russell's behaviors but those behaviors are later attributed to Patricia in official records, it shows how narratives evolved.
For example, on May 17, Cheryl's log notes: "Call w/ staff @ NN Dad threw up after Patty's visit Thursday." But examination of the facility logs shows Russell had been vomiting for days before Patricia's visit—information not included in the report to the guardians.
Russell's medication regimen tells its own story of escalating chemical control.
February 2022 (Admission):
By July 2024 (Post-Hospice Enrollment): The Comprehensive Medication Analysis Report dated July 3, 2024, detailed Russell's regimen:
Primary Sedatives and Antipsychotics:
Contraindicated Medications:
Additional Medications:
The ABHR cream alone combined four sedatives. Tempie Bartell directed use up to four times daily despite staff protests. Elisha Callahand called these applications "chemical restraints."
Critical context: Patricia had consistently warned since 2020 that Ativan caused Russell hallucinations and anxiety. A hospital record from January 6, 2019, explicitly recommended against Benadryl, noting it made Russell "more confused/forgetful."
Both medications were central components of the ABHR cream.
Nadine's Nest billed the guardians for:
Tempie Bartell testified that Russell's behaviors "become very difficult" every time Patricia visited, necessitating additional staff.
Yet Elisha Callahand described the actual staffing situation:
Throughout July 2024, multiple parties claimed authority to lock Patricia out, though none invoked the invalidated IBL:
July 3: Austin Bingaman stated he and his brother "decided to cut off visits" without citing legal authority. Their attorney had abused ORS 125.323, a law specifically designed to prevent guardians from isolating protected persons.
July 9: Tempie Bartell testified she was "allowed to lock the door" by "licensing adult foster home licensing" who told her to "follow the guardians' requests."
July 10: DHS officials on the phone call advised the facility "could lock door to keep Patty out."
The Reality: The October 2023 DHS investigation had already determined the IBL was "not valid and had to be removed." DHS official Cody Yeates clarified in writing that the IBL document was "a support document for your husband, not meant to restrict your access."
Behind the legal maneuvering and documentation battles was a man trying to get home, and a wife fighting to care for him.
Patricia's Enduring Fight
After the IBL was imposed, Patricia initially complied for nearly two weeks. When someone at DHS finally told her the truth—that the IBL was not valid—she went to visit Russell on Halloween, October 31, 2023. She brought him bread pudding from a Mexican bakery, a gift from "not blood kids" as she called them.
Caregiver Ray admitted to Patricia that since she'd been away, Russell had been different—refusing care, staying in his room, locking his door, not smiling or joking. When Patricia suggested maybe he was sad because she wasn't there, Ray claimed "He never mentions you."
When the police arrived to escort Patricia out, she made sure Russell could see what was happening. She told him clearly: "The people that own this home and the people that work here do not want me here to see you."
As she was forced to leave, Patricia asked Russell if she could give him a kiss goodbye. She told him "I love you. I always have and I always will." Russell responded: "I love. I love that. I realized that."
Patricia told the officers: "Russell and I've been married for 57 years... we've been together when I was 14 and him 15." The officer acknowledged her bravery: "Well, you did it anyway. That's bravery. Takes an old farm woman to be brave."
After being escorted out, Patricia went directly to APS to report what happened. She declared: "I will not give up. I will not give in. Russell is my husband. We've toughed it out and I'm not going to quit now."
Throughout the ordeal that followed, she persisted. She drove through ice and snow to reach Russell. She took the stand multiple times in court. She brought him comforts from home, ironed his favorite shirts, and constantly advocated for better care, even providing care herself when Russell proved difficult with staff.
Russell's own attorney would confirm: "...he loves his wife and wants to see her."
Her attorney Glenn Null captured her priorities at the guardianship hearing: "We would consider a win in this matter if...it's a chance to move Mr. Bingaman into a different facility where Ms. Bingaman is more comfortable with the care he gets and is not necessarily the guardian. That would be a win for us in this proceeding. Really, that's how passionate she is, that he is not getting the care that he needs at his current placement."
Patricia's concerns proved prophetic. Russell had multiple emergency room visits. After his transfer to Wildflower Lodge in October 2024, that facility documented what Patricia had long suspected—dangerous over-medication. Their November 7, 2024 letter to hospice physician Dr. Bryan Conklin revealed:
The records show Patricia's value as a caregiver. Staff repeatedly sought her help when Russell refused care. She could convince him to shower when staff couldn't. She noticed his dry skin, the ants in his room, his need for moisturizer. When she brought pie for other residents, she explained, "I just wanted to do something nice for the other folks too"—her compassion extending beyond just her husband.
Former caregiver Lisa Nice testified: "Russell was always delighted to see Patty." Elisha Callahand confirmed other residents "did love Patty." Yet Patricia faced accusations of causing agitation, of touching residents inappropriately, of disrupting the facility—accusations that whistleblowers later revealed were false, part of a documented pattern to "justify visitation restrictions."
Russell's Pleas
Russell's words, captured in recordings and logs:
Fifteen documented escape attempts. Repeated requests to go home. Every recorded visit with Patricia included his request to leave with her.
The facility's response wasn't to honor his wishes or address his distress. According to Callahand, Tempie Bartell's "initial reaction was to contact hospice and get him on more medication."
Instead of moving Russell to a facility that could meet his needs—as Patricia desperately sought—the ABHR cream was increased to four times daily. Instead of allowing comfort from his wife's presence, the door was locked.
The isolation of Russell Bingaman followed a documented pattern, with the guardian logs providing independent verification:
Documentation Manipulation:
Medical Exploitation:
Authority Confusion:
Financial Motivation:
Information Control:
The isolation of Russell Bingaman from his wife didn't happen overnight. Records show a two-year progression:
Phase 1 (February 2022 - December 2022):
Phase 2 (January 2023 - December 2023):
Phase 3 (January 2024 - June 2024):
Phase 4 (June - July 2024):
On July 10, 2024, when DHS officials advised that Nadine's Nest could "lock door to keep Patty out," they provided the mechanism for what had been building for two years. They didn't invoke the IBL that had been ruled invalid. They didn't cite a court order that didn't exist. They advised a locked door based on guardians' wishes. The same day, hospice notes recorded: "Patty is not aware Russell is on hospice again."
A husband who repeatedly asked to go home would remain locked away from his wife for forty-six days. A wife who had visited her husband nearly daily for 58 years would stand outside a locked door. Since they were 14 and 15 years old, Patricia and Russell had only been separated by his service in Vietnam. Now they were separated by a locked door, justified by documents that didn't exist and authority that was never granted.
The guardian logs—maintained by those seeking to restrict Russell's contact with his wife—provide proof showing discrepancies between what the facility reported to guardians and what appeared in official records.
Later hospice paperwork would attempt to rewrite these facts; we address those alterations in our next chapter.
This report relies on sworn testimony, clinical records, guardian logs maintained by Cheryl Murchison, and agency communications cited above. We will append any formal statements those parties later publish in court or with regulators.
Next: Part 2B—The Numbers Don't Lie
This report is based on sworn testimony, contemporaneous records, guardian logs, agency communications, and other documentary evidence cited herein. All factual assertions are supported by the referenced materials, and all opinions or conclusions are presented as interpretations of the disclosed facts. Where possible, direct quotations are used to ensure accuracy and context.
The events described concern matters of significant public interest, including elder care, guardianship practices, and state regulatory oversight. The information presented is intended for public awareness and accountability.
The authors have made diligent efforts to verify the accuracy of all statements and to protect the privacy of non-central individuals. Names and identifying details of third parties have been anonymized or redacted unless already a matter of public record or essential to understanding the issues.
Any communications labeled "for settlement purposes" or similar are included only after confirming they are not subject to mediation privilege or court-ordered confidentiality.
Audio and video materials referenced in this report have been published in transcript form, with consent from Patricia Bingaman, personal representative of Russell Bingaman. Non-consenting third parties have been anonymized or redacted in accordance with applicable privacy laws.
If any party believes a statement herein is inaccurate or wishes to provide a formal response, please contact Info@valorinvestigations.com. Verified corrections or statements will be appended to the online version of this report.
If you've faced isolation, overmedication, or denial of care in Union County adult foster homes — or witnessed concerning practices — contact me. While I won't provide medical or legal advice, I can help review your situation and connect you with resources for accountability.